Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra defended her role as both a leader and a mother on March 19, following criticism from opposition members over her decision to spend time with her children at Government House. The controversy arose after opposition politicians accused her of prioritizing family time over addressing concerns about an invasive fish species threatening local ecosystems.
Opposition leader Natthapong Ruangpanyawut suggested that her actions demonstrated a lack of urgency in addressing public issues. Meanwhile, Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn escalated the criticism with personal attacks, claiming that the Prime Minister’s privileged background detached her from the realities faced by ordinary citizens. His remarks, including a jab about her wearing pearl-adorned shoes, drew backlash from members of the ruling Pheu Thai Party, who accused him of engaging in unconstructive political discourse.
Responding to reporters, Paetongtarn rejected the notion that her family life interfered with her responsibilities as Prime Minister. She emphasized that she remains deeply engaged with national issues and had already instructed the Department of Fisheries to tackle the invasive Blackchin Tilapia outbreak. She added that, like any working parent, she balances her professional duties with personal commitments.
“Whenever I have the opportunity, I take my children to play. But I never let it interfere with my work,” she said. “On busy days, we don’t see each other—just like many working parents.” She stressed the importance of time management, arguing that balancing personal and professional life benefits not just individuals, but also families, organizations, and the country as a whole.
The criticism comes as the government prepares for a no-confidence debate scheduled for March 24. Opposition parties are expected to challenge Paetongtarn’s leadership, with particular focus on allegations that former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, her father, wields undue influence over her administration. In a strategic move, opposition lawmakers have reportedly revised the wording of their motion, replacing direct references to Thaksin with the more ambiguous phrase “family member” to broaden their attack against her leadership.
